.
Feedback

Report: Haley Could Be Indicted Any Day

First-term S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley denies involvement with audit of Sikh temple's financial records

In recent days the Palmetto Public Record has been reporting that S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley and the Sikh Society of South Carolina are under federal investigation.

The story includes what appears to be a copy of letter sent to the Sikh Society from the IRS informing the religious organization that its tax status is being examined. And today the website reports that an indictment of Haley is imminent, and likely to center around the time Haley spent managing the Society's finances.

Haley, according to an article posted Thursday evening by The State, denied having any connection to a 2011 tax audit of the Sikh temple in Chapin where her parents are leaders. She told the paper,

“I have never kept their books. I’ve never made deposits. I never signed checks. I never did financial statements,” Haley said.

"(The) IRS is not permitted to discuss a particular or specific taxpayer's tax matter or their taxes based on federal disclosure regulations and federal law," said IRS spokesman Mark Hanson.

Multiple GOP sources across the state declined to discuss the matter on the record, but one state representative said talk of a possible indictment had the house floor buzzing on Thursday.

Others were discounting the story.

Taft Matney, a Mauldin-based political consultant who has known Haley since before she was elected, said: "I'd be surprised if there is anything major there."

Conservative political news blog Fitsnews.com sees the letter uncovered by Palmetto Public Record as vindication of its own reporting on investigations involving the Sikh Temple and the Governor since 2010.

Recently, alleging Haley committed ethics violations while a member of the State House. Manning ruled that his court was not the proper venue to decide a case involving alleged ethics violations that occurred while Haley served in the House of Representatives.

Haley spokesman Rob Godfrey was not immediately available for comment Thursday afternoon.

South Carolina Republican Party Executive Director Matt Moore declined to discuss the reports.

"At this time we have no comment on internet speculation," Moore said.

Larry Budzowski March 29, 2012 at 06:50 pm
This is not a big thing. As I am also involved with several non-profit organizations the IRS has told of of them that if certain paperwork was not submitted they could be indicted and/or investigated. Niki may have been the last person of record with the organization and the organization did not file. Lets wait for real specifics before we try to dis-credit our Govenor
Travis March 30, 2012 at 01:28 am
just another feather in her cap of cronyism and shady dealings.
Gretchen March 30, 2012 at 12:11 pm
If all these people refuse to talk to you but "one state representative said talk of a possible indictment had the house floor buzzing." -- then why don't you have the name of ONE STATE REPRESENTATIVE... or at least his/her party affiliation. It seems to me you are constantly on a WITCH HUNT for Haley. Do you hate her ethnic background? Do you just not like a woman governor ? Or do you just not like her because she is a Republican? Of course, I guess we need to consider the SOURCE.
Fisher March 30, 2012 at 12:56 pm
Gretchen, She is distrusted for her lack of transparency. That's it. Plain and simple. She constantly slams the door when the people (her employers) try to find out more about her dealings, so of course, there is distrust of what she's doing. And when we do get a glimpse into her e-mail, it usually isn't pretty. That's why stories such as this, while thinly sourced, get traction and are believable. It's not an ethnic thing (I doubt most people would even recognize her as a minority), and it's not a gender thing. It's that little thing called honesty.
Richard Hayes March 30, 2012 at 01:24 pm
Or maybe it is her total lack of leadership.... She has no support from the REPUBLICANS even -- the vote on her Savannah River action was 103-1!!! She continually gets votes of "NO CONFIDENCE" from the State Legislators - majority Republicans!
Neal Norvell March 30, 2012 at 01:58 pm
I still want to see from her a follow up report to her trip with entourage to Europe shortly after she was elected. Remember she took quite a few people from the state, included spouses, stayed and dined in five star locations all under the premise of bringing new business to South Carolina. I would like to see who they met with, what the objective of each meeting was and what has or has not resulted of this trip. I'm willing to bet absolutely nothing was accomplished and the real purpose of this trip was celebratory one for winning the Governorship.
Gretchen April 2, 2012 at 12:06 pm
Well, Fisher, that's the same thing we are getting from the WHITE HOUSE, so you should be used to it.
YISJTINSC April 3, 2012 at 09:10 pm
WISHFUL THINKING

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Charleston Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken June 16, 2013 at 05:31 pm
I have ZERO respect for Haley and her administration but Mr Ford got caught misusing campaignRead More contributions, he needs to suck it up and move on.
Rusty Inman June 16, 2013 at 07:39 pm
At his best, Senator Ford well-represented his district and well-represented a much largerRead More constituency in South Carolina. His contributions should in no way be minimized by either his resignation or the details surrounding it. However, it seems clear that he crossed ethical lines---even as blurred as they are for South Carolina elected officials---per the use of campaign funds and, as such, he has done the right thing. Of course, it seems even more clear that Governor Haley crossed ethical lines per the selling of influence while serving as a member of the House---and those lines aren't nearly as blurred as are those dealing with campaign funds. And, when her primary defense was, in essence, "I was just doing what everybody was doing," are we really supposed to accept a verdict of "not guilty" rendered, if we go by her own defense, by people who were guilty of the same ethical violations as her? Speaker Harrell's issues are, I suppose, still being adjudicated. But I'm calling Vegas to put a bunch of money on the under because my real guess is that the remnants of that investigation will eventually be found under a rug somewhere.
stanley seigler June 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
sen ford presents a good case...can the ethics committee provide specifics of their charges...ifRead More already done are specifics posted on the internet...where??? course wonder how any politician's 'autobiography' would hold up under detailed scrutiny...eg, cheney's rewrite...defense of his lying america into the iraq war...