.
Feedback

White House to Expedite Charleston Port Project

The Obama Administration announced Wednesday Charleston's port deepening project will be expedited.

Charleston's port will be among seven infrastructure projects that the Obama Administration is expediting, according to a White House press release.

According to the White House, "the Army Corps is implementing an aggressive planning schedule for the Charleston Harbor Feasibility Study that will examine the benefits and costs of deepening the Federal navigation channel for Charleston Harbor from its existing depth of 45 feet to a maximum of 50 feet to accommodate."

S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley issued the following statement following the announcement:

“This is a huge win for Charleston and for all of South Carolina.  Back in February, I stressed to the President how important deepening Charleston's Port was and how frustrating the Army Corps' timetable was, and I'm thrilled to see the Administration has sped up our project.  We've said all along that Charleston was the class of the ports on the east coast, that we weren't afraid of competition, and that at the end of the day we would have a 50 ft deepwater port that was envied around the world.  Today is a huge, huge leap forward for our state.”

Rep. James Clyburn also issued a statement.

“I have been working closely with the Obama Administration to expedite the Charleston Harbor deepening, and I appreciate their responsiveness to our request.  In addition to the Army Corps announcement last week, the President’s inclusion of the harbor deepening in the We Can’t Wait initiative reiterates this Administration’s commitment to this project.  More than just a parochial initiative, expediting the deepening the Charleston Harbor will improve our nation’s infrastructure and create jobs.” 

WISTV reports that the administration is committing to completing all reviews by September 2015.

Mike N. July 19, 2012 at 11:16 am
Will Haley veto this as too much evil big government assistance? (Oops, wrong thread)
SDR July 20, 2012 at 01:31 pm
All the better to outsource more jobs.
JoSCh July 20, 2012 at 01:43 pm
I see you blaming someone, but I'm not sure who...

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Charleston Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken June 16, 2013 at 05:31 pm
I have ZERO respect for Haley and her administration but Mr Ford got caught misusing campaignRead More contributions, he needs to suck it up and move on.
Rusty Inman June 16, 2013 at 07:39 pm
At his best, Senator Ford well-represented his district and well-represented a much largerRead More constituency in South Carolina. His contributions should in no way be minimized by either his resignation or the details surrounding it. However, it seems clear that he crossed ethical lines---even as blurred as they are for South Carolina elected officials---per the use of campaign funds and, as such, he has done the right thing. Of course, it seems even more clear that Governor Haley crossed ethical lines per the selling of influence while serving as a member of the House---and those lines aren't nearly as blurred as are those dealing with campaign funds. And, when her primary defense was, in essence, "I was just doing what everybody was doing," are we really supposed to accept a verdict of "not guilty" rendered, if we go by her own defense, by people who were guilty of the same ethical violations as her? Speaker Harrell's issues are, I suppose, still being adjudicated. But I'm calling Vegas to put a bunch of money on the under because my real guess is that the remnants of that investigation will eventually be found under a rug somewhere.
stanley seigler June 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
sen ford presents a good case...can the ethics committee provide specifics of their charges...ifRead More already done are specifics posted on the internet...where??? course wonder how any politician's 'autobiography' would hold up under detailed scrutiny...eg, cheney's rewrite...defense of his lying america into the iraq war...